
How to Rebalance Your Portfolio
A portfolio built five years ago with a 60% stock and 40% bond split can drift to roughly 72% stock after a strong run in equities. That quiet shift...
The hardest part of investing is rarely choosing what to buy. It is sticking with a sensible choice on the day the market does something loud. A one-page investment policy statement is a cheap device for that problem: you write down the rules while you are calm, so that later you only have to follow them rather than re-argue them with yourself.
Professional institutions do this because committees are made of people who panic. A household is a committee of one, with the same weakness and fewer minutes. The document does not need legal language, a spreadsheet, or a forecast. It needs to fit on one page and answer six questions.
Name the job and the date. "Retirement around 2045" and "a deposit in 2030" are entirely different briefs, and writing them together in one document is itself a useful discovery. If you find three incompatible jobs attached to one account, split the money conceptually before you pick a single holding. Most allocation mistakes are really job-description mistakes.
Write a target as a range, not a precise number: something like "roughly 70 to 80 percent broad equity funds, the rest in high-quality bonds and cash." A range gives you room to rebalance without turning every one-point drift into a decision. Include which account holds what if you have several, and note any concentration you are deliberately avoiding.
Avoid naming favourite funds in this section. Products change, merge, and close. Asset classes and purposes last longer, and a statement that survives a decade is worth more than one that needs rewriting every spring.
This is the sentence that earns its keep. Decide now whether a twenty or thirty percent decline triggers selling, buying, or nothing at all, and write it in plain words. A common and defensible answer is: continue the scheduled contributions, rebalance on the annual date, and do not sell because of a price movement alone. Whatever you choose, the point is that the decision is made before the emotion arrives.
Pick a rhythm. Monthly contributions are automatic; a quarterly glance at the balance is plenty; an annual check of the allocation and the fee schedule is the real review. Write down that you will not open the account during a headline-driven week. Checking frequently does not add information for a long-horizon plan, but it reliably adds impulses.
List the small set of legitimate reasons: a change in the goal or its date, a major shift in income or dependants, a sustained change in your tolerance for volatility that you have thought about for more than a month, or a genuine error in the original design. Explicitly exclude "a fund had a bad year," "a friend made money in something else," and "a headline was alarming." Naming the invalid reasons is oddly effective.
That list is personal. The value is not that it is clever but that it is yours, written when you were not trying to talk yourself into anything.
Print it, or keep it in the same folder as your statements, and read it once a year on a fixed date. If a decision comes up in between, look for the sentence that covers it. If none does, that is a signal to wait a week and think rather than to improvise in the moment.
A market fall is not the time to design a philosophy. It is the time to discover whether you wrote one down. The investors who come through a bad stretch with their plan intact are usually not the ones with the most conviction; they are the ones who made the decision early, in a quiet room, and left themselves a note.